Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa

1.6%
24.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 74119 24.9% 10.6% (+14.3)#12 11.2% (+13.7)#991
2. 74120 21.1% 10.6% (+10.5)#21 11.2% (+9.93)#1,675
3. 74103 17.3% 10.6% (+6.69)#47 11.2% (+6.08)#3,189
4. 74114 16.9% 10.6% (+6.30)#52 11.2% (+5.69)#3,443
5. 74171 16.4% 10.6% (+5.82)#59 11.2% (+5.21)#3,744
6. 74135 16.4% 10.6% (+5.79)#60 11.2% (+5.18)#3,769
7. 74105 15.9% 10.6% (+5.32)#64 11.2% (+4.71)#4,128
8. 74104 15.9% 10.6% (+5.31)#65 11.2% (+4.70)#4,132
9. 74137 14.9% 10.6% (+4.28)#83 11.2% (+3.67)#5,072
10. 74132 12.7% 10.6% (+2.09)#137 11.2% (+1.48)#8,069
11. 74112 11.9% 10.6% (+1.26)#167 11.2% (+0.655)#9,628
12. 74107 11.7% 10.6% (+1.07)#173 11.2% (+0.464)#10,056
13. 74133 11.6% 10.6% (+0.990)#176 11.2% (+0.381)#10,239
14. 74106 11.2% 10.6% (+0.595)#193 11.2% (-0.014)#11,127
15. 74127 11.0% 10.6% (+0.403)#200 11.2% (-0.206)#11,623
16. 74145 10.0% 10.6% (-0.558)#258 11.2% (-1.17)#14,007
17. 74136 9.9% 10.6% (-0.725)#268 11.2% (-1.33)#14,455
18. 74131 8.4% 10.6% (-2.18)#356 11.2% (-2.79)#18,400
19. 74130 7.9% 10.6% (-2.67)#390 11.2% (-3.28)#19,751
20. 74134 6.9% 10.6% (-3.68)#450 11.2% (-4.29)#22,320
21. 74129 6.6% 10.6% (-3.99)#464 11.2% (-4.60)#22,997
22. 74108 5.2% 10.6% (-5.44)#527 11.2% (-6.05)#25,921
23. 74115 5.1% 10.6% (-5.50)#531 11.2% (-6.11)#26,028
24. 74126 4.9% 10.6% (-5.72)#539 11.2% (-6.33)#26,370
25. 74128 3.9% 10.6% (-6.67)#561 11.2% (-7.28)#27,627
26. 74110 3.5% 10.6% (-7.07)#582 11.2% (-7.68)#28,054
27. 74146 2.7% 10.6% (-7.95)#592 11.2% (-8.55)#28,797
28. 74116 1.6% 10.6% (-9.00)#608 11.2% (-9.61)#29,451

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
24.9%
#2
21.1%
#3
17.3%
#4
16.9%
#5
16.4%
#6
16.4%
#7
15.9%
#8
15.9%
#9
14.9%
#10
12.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK?
74119 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK with 24.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Tulsa is 11.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma is 10.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.