Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utilities
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Raleigh100.0%1.4%(+98.6)#10.84%(+99.2)#6
2.Mcgregor57.7%1.4%(+56.2)#20.84%(+56.8)#22
3.Columbus40.0%1.4%(+38.6)#30.84%(+39.2)#47
4.Caledonia38.2%1.4%(+36.8)#40.84%(+37.4)#53
5.Berlin21.4%1.4%(+20.0)#50.84%(+20.6)#151
6.Wildrose20.0%1.4%(+18.6)#60.84%(+19.2)#172
7.Riverdale19.8%1.4%(+18.4)#70.84%(+19.0)#176
8.Four Bears Village18.3%1.4%(+16.9)#80.84%(+17.5)#202
9.Zap14.8%1.4%(+13.3)#90.84%(+13.9)#296
10.Menoken14.7%1.4%(+13.3)#100.84%(+13.9)#298
11.Pick City14.0%1.4%(+12.5)#110.84%(+13.1)#327
12.Hazen12.5%1.4%(+11.1)#120.84%(+11.7)#379
13.Washburn10.3%1.4%(+8.89)#130.84%(+9.49)#500
14.Drake9.3%1.4%(+7.82)#140.84%(+8.42)#589
15.Elliott9.1%1.4%(+7.65)#150.84%(+8.25)#611
16.Casselton8.8%1.4%(+7.38)#160.84%(+7.98)#629
17.Harmon8.1%1.4%(+6.67)#170.84%(+7.27)#711
18.Sykeston8.0%1.4%(+6.56)#180.84%(+7.16)#727
19.Coleharbor7.7%1.4%(+6.25)#190.84%(+6.86)#772
20.Ashley7.5%1.4%(+6.10)#200.84%(+6.70)#787
21.Cannon Ball6.7%1.4%(+5.31)#210.84%(+5.91)#911
22.Fort Yates6.7%1.4%(+5.23)#220.84%(+5.83)#939
23.Forbes6.7%1.4%(+5.23)#230.84%(+5.83)#943
24.Beulah6.6%1.4%(+5.19)#240.84%(+5.79)#949
25.Garrison6.4%1.4%(+4.99)#250.84%(+5.59)#997
26.Dodge6.2%1.4%(+4.81)#260.84%(+5.41)#1,036
27.Center6.0%1.4%(+4.59)#270.84%(+5.19)#1,095
28.Bowbells5.3%1.4%(+3.91)#280.84%(+4.51)#1,308
29.Golden Valley5.0%1.4%(+3.56)#290.84%(+4.16)#1,467
30.Noonan4.8%1.4%(+3.40)#300.84%(+4.00)#1,540
31.Milnor4.7%1.4%(+3.26)#310.84%(+3.86)#1,606
32.Velva4.7%1.4%(+3.26)#320.84%(+3.86)#1,607
33.Galesburg4.7%1.4%(+3.21)#330.84%(+3.81)#1,636
34.Underwood4.6%1.4%(+3.12)#340.84%(+3.72)#1,683
35.Cando4.5%1.4%(+3.06)#350.84%(+3.66)#1,728
36.Plaza4.2%1.4%(+2.77)#360.84%(+3.37)#1,893
37.Crosby4.2%1.4%(+2.76)#370.84%(+3.36)#1,903
38.Osnabrock4.2%1.4%(+2.73)#380.84%(+3.33)#1,929
39.Carpio4.0%1.4%(+2.56)#390.84%(+3.16)#2,037
40.Wilton4.0%1.4%(+2.54)#400.84%(+3.14)#2,061
41.Turtle Lake3.9%1.4%(+2.51)#410.84%(+3.11)#2,077
42.Reeder3.8%1.4%(+2.41)#420.84%(+3.01)#2,163
43.Glen Ullin3.8%1.4%(+2.38)#430.84%(+2.98)#2,178
44.Rugby3.8%1.4%(+2.37)#440.84%(+2.97)#2,192
45.Sheldon3.8%1.4%(+2.34)#450.84%(+2.94)#2,213
46.Litchville3.8%1.4%(+2.34)#460.84%(+2.94)#2,214
47.Linton3.7%1.4%(+2.31)#470.84%(+2.91)#2,239
48.Stanton3.6%1.4%(+2.20)#480.84%(+2.80)#2,340
49.Drayton3.6%1.4%(+2.15)#490.84%(+2.75)#2,380
50.Arnegard3.5%1.4%(+2.09)#500.84%(+2.69)#2,422
51.Wing3.4%1.4%(+2.01)#510.84%(+2.61)#2,498
52.Finley3.4%1.4%(+1.92)#520.84%(+2.52)#2,588
53.Harvey3.3%1.4%(+1.85)#530.84%(+2.46)#2,646
54.Stanley3.2%1.4%(+1.80)#540.84%(+2.40)#2,711
55.Oakes3.1%1.4%(+1.70)#550.84%(+2.30)#2,793
56.Watford City3.1%1.4%(+1.69)#560.84%(+2.29)#2,805
57.Alamo2.9%1.4%(+1.50)#570.84%(+2.10)#3,021
58.Dunn Center2.9%1.4%(+1.42)#580.84%(+2.02)#3,119
59.Williston2.8%1.4%(+1.39)#590.84%(+1.99)#3,167
60.Parshall2.8%1.4%(+1.32)#600.84%(+1.92)#3,261
61.Bottineau2.5%1.4%(+1.10)#610.84%(+1.70)#3,594
62.Ellendale2.3%1.4%(+0.903)#620.84%(+1.50)#3,928
63.Buxton2.2%1.4%(+0.809)#630.84%(+1.41)#4,100
64.Killdeer2.2%1.4%(+0.760)#640.84%(+1.36)#4,197
65.Regent2.2%1.4%(+0.760)#650.84%(+1.36)#4,201
66.Dickinson2.2%1.4%(+0.757)#660.84%(+1.36)#4,203
67.Dawson2.2%1.4%(+0.736)#670.84%(+1.34)#4,259
68.Argusville2.1%1.4%(+0.709)#680.84%(+1.31)#4,316
69.Bismarck2.1%1.4%(+0.703)#690.84%(+1.30)#4,329
70.New England2.1%1.4%(+0.690)#700.84%(+1.29)#4,362
71.Mandan2.1%1.4%(+0.689)#710.84%(+1.29)#4,369
72.Tower City2.1%1.4%(+0.624)#720.84%(+1.22)#4,505
73.Wishek2.0%1.4%(+0.594)#730.84%(+1.19)#4,578
74.Gackle2.0%1.4%(+0.562)#740.84%(+1.16)#4,658
75.Flasher2.0%1.4%(+0.523)#750.84%(+1.12)#4,744
76.Hoople1.8%1.4%(+0.380)#760.84%(+0.981)#5,109
77.Edgeley1.8%1.4%(+0.369)#770.84%(+0.970)#5,145
78.Burlington1.7%1.4%(+0.226)#780.84%(+0.827)#5,586
79.Richardton1.7%1.4%(+0.221)#790.84%(+0.822)#5,602
80.Fordville1.5%1.4%(+0.101)#800.84%(+0.701)#6,032
81.Lincoln1.5%1.4%(+0.096)#810.84%(+0.697)#6,042
82.Strasburg1.5%1.4%(+0.077)#820.84%(+0.678)#6,107
83.Carrington1.5%1.4%(+0.040)#830.84%(+0.641)#6,245
84.Aneta1.5%1.4%(+0.033)#840.84%(+0.634)#6,276
85.Glenburn1.5%1.4%(+0.018)#850.84%(+0.619)#6,325
86.Granville1.4%1.4%(-0.049)#860.84%(+0.552)#6,577
87.Maddock1.3%1.4%(-0.148)#870.84%(+0.453)#7,002
88.Walcott1.3%1.4%(-0.148)#880.84%(+0.453)#7,003
89.Leeds1.3%1.4%(-0.150)#890.84%(+0.450)#7,012
90.Davenport1.3%1.4%(-0.188)#900.84%(+0.413)#7,186
91.Bowman1.2%1.4%(-0.230)#910.84%(+0.371)#7,386
92.Mcclusky1.2%1.4%(-0.233)#920.84%(+0.368)#7,415
93.Mohall1.2%1.4%(-0.252)#930.84%(+0.349)#7,518
94.New Leipzig1.2%1.4%(-0.261)#940.84%(+0.339)#7,564
95.Tioga1.2%1.4%(-0.267)#950.84%(+0.334)#7,597
96.Rolette1.1%1.4%(-0.308)#960.84%(+0.293)#7,792
97.Enderlin1.1%1.4%(-0.339)#970.84%(+0.262)#7,961
98.Westhope1.1%1.4%(-0.339)#980.84%(+0.262)#7,970
99.Mott1.1%1.4%(-0.359)#990.84%(+0.242)#8,075
100.Ray1.0%1.4%(-0.393)#1000.84%(+0.207)#8,255

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
40.0%
#3
38.2%
#4
21.4%
#5
20.0%
#6
19.8%
#7
18.3%
#8
14.8%
#9
14.7%
#10
14.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota?
Raleigh has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in North Dakota is 1.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States is 0.84%.