Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utilities
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama

0.0%
30.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Stockton 29.8% 1.4% (+28.5)#1 0.84% (+29.0)#83
2. Deer Park 28.6% 1.4% (+27.2)#2 0.84% (+27.7)#91
3. Leroy 20.5% 1.4% (+19.1)#3 0.84% (+19.6)#165
4. Hodges 19.4% 1.4% (+18.0)#4 0.84% (+18.5)#182
5. Rosa 17.5% 1.4% (+16.1)#5 0.84% (+16.7)#215
6. Billingsley 17.4% 1.4% (+16.0)#6 0.84% (+16.6)#218
7. Brilliant 16.9% 1.4% (+15.5)#7 0.84% (+16.1)#232
8. Hobson 15.8% 1.4% (+14.4)#8 0.84% (+15.0)#258
9. Ranburne 12.8% 1.4% (+11.4)#9 0.84% (+12.0)#366
10. North Johns 12.5% 1.4% (+11.1)#10 0.84% (+11.7)#382
11. Millerville 11.5% 1.4% (+10.1)#11 0.84% (+10.7)#441
12. Grimes 9.5% 1.4% (+8.13)#12 0.84% (+8.67)#576
13. West Jefferson 8.9% 1.4% (+7.52)#13 0.84% (+8.05)#623
14. Rogersville 8.8% 1.4% (+7.39)#14 0.84% (+7.93)#634
15. Axis 8.7% 1.4% (+7.28)#15 0.84% (+7.82)#648
16. Gallant 8.1% 1.4% (+6.70)#16 0.84% (+7.23)#717
17. Waterloo 8.0% 1.4% (+6.63)#17 0.84% (+7.16)#726
18. Cherokee 7.7% 1.4% (+6.35)#18 0.84% (+6.88)#762
19. Brantley 7.7% 1.4% (+6.32)#19 0.84% (+6.86)#764
20. Abbeville 7.4% 1.4% (+6.06)#20 0.84% (+6.60)#803
21. Our Town 7.4% 1.4% (+6.06)#21 0.84% (+6.59)#804
22. Jemison 7.3% 1.4% (+5.96)#22 0.84% (+6.49)#818
23. Satsuma 7.0% 1.4% (+5.60)#23 0.84% (+6.13)#867
24. Silas 6.9% 1.4% (+5.53)#24 0.84% (+6.06)#880
25. Point Clear 6.8% 1.4% (+5.39)#25 0.84% (+5.92)#907
26. Oak Grove 6.7% 1.4% (+5.36)#26 0.84% (+5.89)#913
27. East Brewton 6.7% 1.4% (+5.33)#27 0.84% (+5.86)#923
28. Pennington 6.5% 1.4% (+5.12)#28 0.84% (+5.65)#984
29. Pickensville 6.4% 1.4% (+5.07)#29 0.84% (+5.60)#996
30. Silverhill 6.3% 1.4% (+4.98)#30 0.84% (+5.51)#1,013
31. Horn Hill 6.3% 1.4% (+4.97)#31 0.84% (+5.50)#1,019
32. Bakerhill 6.3% 1.4% (+4.94)#32 0.84% (+5.47)#1,023
33. Red Bay 6.3% 1.4% (+4.88)#33 0.84% (+5.42)#1,029
34. St Florian 6.1% 1.4% (+4.77)#34 0.84% (+5.30)#1,069
35. Weaver 5.8% 1.4% (+4.48)#35 0.84% (+5.01)#1,144
36. Pleasant Grove 5.8% 1.4% (+4.47)#36 0.84% (+5.00)#1,146
37. New Union 5.8% 1.4% (+4.46)#37 0.84% (+5.00)#1,151
38. Parrish 5.7% 1.4% (+4.36)#38 0.84% (+4.89)#1,193
39. Mooresville 5.7% 1.4% (+4.34)#39 0.84% (+4.88)#1,199
40. Wilsonville 5.6% 1.4% (+4.26)#40 0.84% (+4.79)#1,221
41. Madrid 5.5% 1.4% (+4.08)#41 0.84% (+4.62)#1,272
42. Malvern 5.4% 1.4% (+4.00)#42 0.84% (+4.53)#1,296
43. Onycha 5.4% 1.4% (+3.99)#43 0.84% (+4.52)#1,304
44. Westover 5.3% 1.4% (+3.96)#44 0.84% (+4.49)#1,318
45. Thorsby 5.3% 1.4% (+3.90)#45 0.84% (+4.43)#1,340
46. Pea Ridge 5.2% 1.4% (+3.84)#46 0.84% (+4.37)#1,365
47. Slocomb 5.2% 1.4% (+3.82)#47 0.84% (+4.36)#1,378
48. Winfield 5.1% 1.4% (+3.71)#48 0.84% (+4.25)#1,427
49. Lester 5.0% 1.4% (+3.63)#49 0.84% (+4.16)#1,469
50. Hurtsboro 5.0% 1.4% (+3.58)#50 0.84% (+4.12)#1,488
51. Columbiana 5.0% 1.4% (+3.58)#51 0.84% (+4.12)#1,489
52. Sanford 4.9% 1.4% (+3.57)#52 0.84% (+4.10)#1,495
53. Bear Creek 4.9% 1.4% (+3.50)#53 0.84% (+4.03)#1,526
54. Gaylesville 4.8% 1.4% (+3.47)#54 0.84% (+4.00)#1,539
55. Cordova 4.7% 1.4% (+3.33)#55 0.84% (+3.86)#1,605
56. Gardendale 4.6% 1.4% (+3.22)#56 0.84% (+3.76)#1,668
57. Wadley 4.5% 1.4% (+3.17)#57 0.84% (+3.71)#1,693
58. Kellyton 4.5% 1.4% (+3.12)#58 0.84% (+3.66)#1,733
59. White Plains 4.4% 1.4% (+3.06)#59 0.84% (+3.59)#1,774
60. Andalusia 4.4% 1.4% (+3.05)#60 0.84% (+3.58)#1,778
61. Midway 4.4% 1.4% (+3.04)#61 0.84% (+3.57)#1,784
62. Pollard 4.3% 1.4% (+2.98)#62 0.84% (+3.51)#1,828
63. Grand Bay 4.3% 1.4% (+2.91)#63 0.84% (+3.44)#1,860
64. Dutton 4.2% 1.4% (+2.86)#64 0.84% (+3.40)#1,883
65. Centre 4.2% 1.4% (+2.82)#65 0.84% (+3.35)#1,909
66. Perdido 4.2% 1.4% (+2.81)#66 0.84% (+3.35)#1,913
67. Pine Apple 4.2% 1.4% (+2.80)#67 0.84% (+3.33)#1,930
68. Kimberly 4.1% 1.4% (+2.77)#68 0.84% (+3.30)#1,953
69. Addison 4.1% 1.4% (+2.74)#69 0.84% (+3.27)#1,963
70. Muscle Shoals 4.0% 1.4% (+2.63)#70 0.84% (+3.17)#2,031
71. Sheffield 4.0% 1.4% (+2.62)#71 0.84% (+3.15)#2,049
72. Dauphin Island 4.0% 1.4% (+2.59)#72 0.84% (+3.13)#2,067
73. Jasper 4.0% 1.4% (+2.58)#73 0.84% (+3.11)#2,076
74. Ashford 3.9% 1.4% (+2.55)#74 0.84% (+3.08)#2,096
75. Boaz 3.8% 1.4% (+2.47)#75 0.84% (+3.00)#2,168
76. Chatom 3.7% 1.4% (+2.38)#76 0.84% (+2.91)#2,233
77. Childersburg 3.7% 1.4% (+2.37)#77 0.84% (+2.90)#2,245
78. Lineville 3.7% 1.4% (+2.36)#78 0.84% (+2.89)#2,254
79. Eagle Point 3.7% 1.4% (+2.30)#79 0.84% (+2.83)#2,306
80. Wedowee 3.6% 1.4% (+2.23)#80 0.84% (+2.76)#2,368
81. Moundville 3.6% 1.4% (+2.19)#81 0.84% (+2.72)#2,401
82. Hollywood 3.5% 1.4% (+2.12)#82 0.84% (+2.65)#2,456
83. Rehobeth 3.5% 1.4% (+2.11)#83 0.84% (+2.64)#2,473
84. Redstone Arsenal 3.4% 1.4% (+2.04)#84 0.84% (+2.57)#2,534
85. Shoal Creek 3.4% 1.4% (+2.00)#85 0.84% (+2.54)#2,569
86. Owens Cross Roads 3.3% 1.4% (+1.95)#86 0.84% (+2.48)#2,622
87. Loxley 3.3% 1.4% (+1.94)#87 0.84% (+2.48)#2,625
88. Heath 3.3% 1.4% (+1.93)#88 0.84% (+2.46)#2,643
89. Clayhatchee 3.3% 1.4% (+1.89)#89 0.84% (+2.42)#2,682
90. Coaling 3.3% 1.4% (+1.89)#90 0.84% (+2.42)#2,690
91. Concord 3.2% 1.4% (+1.87)#91 0.84% (+2.41)#2,703
92. Meadowbrook 3.2% 1.4% (+1.87)#92 0.84% (+2.40)#2,713
93. Gordo 3.2% 1.4% (+1.83)#93 0.84% (+2.36)#2,743
94. Red Level 3.2% 1.4% (+1.81)#94 0.84% (+2.34)#2,758
95. Pelham 3.2% 1.4% (+1.81)#95 0.84% (+2.34)#2,763
96. Arley 3.2% 1.4% (+1.80)#96 0.84% (+2.33)#2,776
97. Heflin 3.1% 1.4% (+1.76)#97 0.84% (+2.29)#2,803
98. Eclectic 3.1% 1.4% (+1.73)#98 0.84% (+2.27)#2,827
99. Douglas 3.0% 1.4% (+1.65)#99 0.84% (+2.18)#2,926
100. Brookwood 3.0% 1.4% (+1.64)#100 0.84% (+2.17)#2,945

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama are:
#1
29.8%
#2
28.6%
#3
20.5%
#4
19.4%
#5
17.5%
#6
17.4%
#7
16.9%
#8
15.8%
#9
12.8%
#10
12.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama?
Stockton has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama with 29.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Alabama is 1.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States is 0.84%.