Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 75+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Jim Falls 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#1 11.1% (+88.9)#164
2. Dekorra 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#2 11.1% (+88.9)#241
3. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#3 11.1% (+88.9)#249
4. Conrath 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#4 11.1% (+88.9)#269
5. Mason 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#5 11.1% (+88.9)#274
6. Tilleda 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#6 11.1% (+88.9)#305
7. Jump River 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#7 11.1% (+88.9)#314
8. Fulton 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#8 11.1% (+88.9)#350
9. Paac Ciinak 85.7% 9.4% (+76.3)#9 11.1% (+74.6)#447
10. King 70.4% 9.4% (+61.0)#10 11.1% (+59.3)#618
11. Gratiot 69.2% 9.4% (+59.8)#11 11.1% (+58.2)#635
12. Florence 62.3% 9.4% (+52.9)#12 11.1% (+51.2)#782
13. Highland 56.5% 9.4% (+47.1)#13 11.1% (+45.4)#970
14. Bagley 52.0% 9.4% (+42.6)#14 11.1% (+40.9)#1,122
15. Franks Field 50.0% 9.4% (+40.6)#15 11.1% (+38.9)#1,276
16. Trego 50.0% 9.4% (+40.6)#16 11.1% (+38.9)#1,289
17. Boyceville 49.5% 9.4% (+40.1)#17 11.1% (+38.5)#1,316
18. St Joseph 47.8% 9.4% (+38.4)#18 11.1% (+36.8)#1,390
19. Lake Lorraine 45.5% 9.4% (+36.0)#19 11.1% (+34.4)#1,532
20. Lewis 44.4% 9.4% (+35.0)#20 11.1% (+33.4)#1,595
21. Friesland 43.8% 9.4% (+34.3)#21 11.1% (+32.7)#1,628
22. Iron Ridge 42.9% 9.4% (+33.4)#22 11.1% (+31.8)#1,683
23. Eureka 40.0% 9.4% (+30.6)#23 11.1% (+28.9)#1,923
24. Pine River 40.0% 9.4% (+30.6)#24 11.1% (+28.9)#1,942
25. Ingram 40.0% 9.4% (+30.6)#25 11.1% (+28.9)#1,963
26. Vesper 39.4% 9.4% (+30.0)#26 11.1% (+28.3)#1,995
27. Potosi 38.0% 9.4% (+28.6)#27 11.1% (+26.9)#2,125
28. Mondovi 37.3% 9.4% (+27.9)#28 11.1% (+26.3)#2,201
29. Packwaukee 36.7% 9.4% (+27.3)#29 11.1% (+25.6)#2,252
30. Hillsboro 36.6% 9.4% (+27.2)#30 11.1% (+25.6)#2,253
31. Lac Du Flambeau 35.3% 9.4% (+25.9)#31 11.1% (+24.2)#2,373
32. Pigeon Falls 35.3% 9.4% (+25.9)#32 11.1% (+24.2)#2,385
33. New Richmond 34.5% 9.4% (+25.1)#33 11.1% (+23.4)#2,463
34. Mount Calvary 33.8% 9.4% (+24.4)#34 11.1% (+22.7)#2,529
35. New London 33.8% 9.4% (+24.4)#35 11.1% (+22.7)#2,531
36. Fairwater 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#36 11.1% (+22.3)#2,624
37. Rockdale 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#37 11.1% (+22.3)#2,672
38. Gotham 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#38 11.1% (+22.3)#2,674
39. Alto 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#39 11.1% (+22.3)#2,699
40. Woodford 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#40 11.1% (+22.3)#2,703
41. Summit Lake 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#41 11.1% (+22.3)#2,718
42. Sauk City 33.0% 9.4% (+23.6)#42 11.1% (+21.9)#2,748
43. Markesan 31.8% 9.4% (+22.4)#43 11.1% (+20.7)#2,872
44. Como 31.8% 9.4% (+22.4)#44 11.1% (+20.7)#2,873
45. Hatley 31.4% 9.4% (+22.0)#45 11.1% (+20.4)#2,910
46. Ridgeway 31.0% 9.4% (+21.6)#46 11.1% (+20.0)#2,955
47. Fox Lake 30.8% 9.4% (+21.4)#47 11.1% (+19.7)#2,984
48. New Odanah 30.0% 9.4% (+20.6)#48 11.1% (+18.9)#3,122
49. Genoa 30.0% 9.4% (+20.6)#49 11.1% (+18.9)#3,129
50. Port Wing 30.0% 9.4% (+20.6)#50 11.1% (+18.9)#3,139
51. Saxon 30.0% 9.4% (+20.6)#51 11.1% (+18.9)#3,149
52. Barron 29.8% 9.4% (+20.4)#52 11.1% (+18.8)#3,161
53. Ashland 29.7% 9.4% (+20.3)#53 11.1% (+18.6)#3,183
54. Camp Douglas 29.4% 9.4% (+20.0)#54 11.1% (+18.3)#3,227
55. Big Falls 29.4% 9.4% (+20.0)#55 11.1% (+18.3)#3,238
56. Stratford 29.2% 9.4% (+19.8)#56 11.1% (+18.1)#3,259
57. Westfield 29.1% 9.4% (+19.7)#57 11.1% (+18.0)#3,278
58. Delavan 28.6% 9.4% (+19.2)#58 11.1% (+17.6)#3,326
59. Pittsville 28.6% 9.4% (+19.2)#59 11.1% (+17.5)#3,339
60. Aniwa 28.6% 9.4% (+19.2)#60 11.1% (+17.5)#3,364
61. St Francis 28.3% 9.4% (+18.9)#61 11.1% (+17.2)#3,417
62. Ashwaubenon 27.4% 9.4% (+18.0)#62 11.1% (+16.4)#3,557
63. Rosendale 27.4% 9.4% (+18.0)#63 11.1% (+16.3)#3,565
64. Stanley 27.4% 9.4% (+18.0)#64 11.1% (+16.3)#3,568
65. Chilton 27.3% 9.4% (+17.9)#65 11.1% (+16.2)#3,580
66. Cambria 27.3% 9.4% (+17.9)#66 11.1% (+16.2)#3,584
67. Caroline 27.3% 9.4% (+17.9)#67 11.1% (+16.2)#3,594
68. Radisson 27.3% 9.4% (+17.9)#68 11.1% (+16.2)#3,602
69. Gilman 27.1% 9.4% (+17.7)#69 11.1% (+16.0)#3,647
70. Bangor 26.8% 9.4% (+17.4)#70 11.1% (+15.8)#3,696
71. Necedah 26.5% 9.4% (+17.1)#71 11.1% (+15.5)#3,751
72. Readstown 26.3% 9.4% (+16.9)#72 11.1% (+15.2)#3,801
73. Oliver 26.3% 9.4% (+16.9)#73 11.1% (+15.2)#3,803
74. Krakow 26.3% 9.4% (+16.9)#74 11.1% (+15.2)#3,804
75. Kellnersville 26.1% 9.4% (+16.7)#75 11.1% (+15.0)#3,859
76. Brice Prairie 26.0% 9.4% (+16.6)#76 11.1% (+14.9)#3,877
77. Bancroft 25.9% 9.4% (+16.5)#77 11.1% (+14.9)#3,890
78. Sextonville 25.6% 9.4% (+16.2)#78 11.1% (+14.6)#3,960
79. Bruce 25.5% 9.4% (+16.1)#79 11.1% (+14.4)#3,989
80. Colby 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#80 11.1% (+13.9)#4,061
81. Withee 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#81 11.1% (+13.9)#4,101
82. Birch Hill 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#82 11.1% (+13.9)#4,120
83. Seneca 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#83 11.1% (+13.9)#4,123
84. White Lake 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#84 11.1% (+13.9)#4,133
85. Steuben 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#85 11.1% (+13.9)#4,160
86. Merrill 24.6% 9.4% (+15.2)#86 11.1% (+13.5)#4,251
87. Reedsville 24.0% 9.4% (+14.6)#87 11.1% (+12.9)#4,364
88. Biron 23.6% 9.4% (+14.2)#88 11.1% (+12.5)#4,490
89. Wabeno 23.5% 9.4% (+14.1)#89 11.1% (+12.5)#4,514
90. Weyauwega 23.4% 9.4% (+14.0)#90 11.1% (+12.4)#4,529
91. Princeton 23.3% 9.4% (+13.9)#91 11.1% (+12.3)#4,556
92. North Fond Du Lac 23.2% 9.4% (+13.8)#92 11.1% (+12.2)#4,573
93. Barneveld 23.1% 9.4% (+13.7)#93 11.1% (+12.0)#4,607
94. Hatfield 23.1% 9.4% (+13.7)#94 11.1% (+12.0)#4,637
95. Dousman 23.0% 9.4% (+13.6)#95 11.1% (+11.9)#4,655
96. Nelson 22.9% 9.4% (+13.4)#96 11.1% (+11.8)#4,697
97. Shell Lake 22.8% 9.4% (+13.4)#97 11.1% (+11.8)#4,700
98. Soldiers Grove 22.7% 9.4% (+13.3)#98 11.1% (+11.7)#4,729
99. Lake Wazeecha 22.7% 9.4% (+13.2)#99 11.1% (+11.6)#4,746
100. Shullsburg 22.6% 9.4% (+13.2)#100 11.1% (+11.5)#4,758

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
70.4%
#7
69.2%
#8
62.3%
#9
56.5%
#10
52.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin?
Jim Falls has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Wisconsin is 9.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States is 11.1%.