Immigrants from Honduras vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,871,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Honduras communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Honduras within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Honduras corresponds to an increase of 63.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,328 compared to $85,553, a difference of 10.6%), median family income ($83,618 compared to $92,239, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,697 compared to $90,909, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($36,665 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,267 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.5%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 15.6%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.57%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (56.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.6%), college, 1 year or more (51.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.80%).