Immigrants from Colombia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,835,330 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Colombia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Colombia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Colombia corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,971 compared to $37,857, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,204 compared to $85,553, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,714 compared to $50,041, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,658 compared to $56,722, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and median female earnings ($38,913 compared to $36,841, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.7%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.62%), 6th grade (96.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and 8th grade (94.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.3%).