Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,281,271 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 75.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,938 compared to $37,857, a difference of 24.0%), median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $49,190, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($110,159 compared to $92,239, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $50,041, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $36,841, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $56,722, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.1%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and single father poverty (17.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.2%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%).