Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,215,349 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 33.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $37,857, a difference of 53.1%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $49,190, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $92,239, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $50,041, a difference of 13.2%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $56,722, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.1%), currently married (47.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 69.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 112.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 103.6%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.1%).