Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,331,605 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.7%), per capita income ($41,709 compared to $37,857, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $50,041, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $90,909, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $56,722, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($94,665 compared to $92,239, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.1%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.1%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.79%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 215.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 97.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 78.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 23.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 78.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.99%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%).