U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,528,042 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 33.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $90,909, a difference of 9.9%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $78,327, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,589 compared to $37,857, a difference of 0.71%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $42,884, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 88.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 65.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 45.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.7%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.20%), college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.9%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.40%).