Chilean vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,246,563 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 75.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $37,857, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $92,239, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $90,909, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,041, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 25.8%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%).