Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,699,493 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $37,857, a difference of 11.6%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.8%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $92,239, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.76%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $78,327, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.9%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.5%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.73%).