Central American vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,770,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $50,041, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $49,190, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $90,909, a difference of 0.050%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $85,553, a difference of 0.48%), and median household income ($78,803 compared to $78,327, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.0%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 8.0%), currently married (43.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%), no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.80%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%).