Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,268,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,654 compared to $56,722, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $90,909, a difference of 8.8%), and median household income ($73,515 compared to $78,327, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,520 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.96%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,304 compared to $85,553, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 73.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 54.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.56%), single female poverty (22.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.0%), married-couple households (36.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.2%), family households (61.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 125.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 102.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 12.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 65.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (53.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 14.2%), college, 1 year or more (48.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), 2nd grade (96.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and 3rd grade (96.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age over 75 (52.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.5%).