Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,159,713 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,979 compared to $37,857, a difference of 21.5%), median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $49,190, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $85,553, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $50,041, a difference of 10.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.4%).