Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,958,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 91.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $37,857, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $49,190, a difference of 20.5%), and median family income ($110,137 compared to $92,239, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $50,041, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 24.6%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 65.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 69.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.7%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.6%).