Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,571,833 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 56.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $37,857, a difference of 30.2%), median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $49,190, a difference of 21.6%), and median family income ($111,378 compared to $92,239, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $50,041, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $56,722, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.1%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%).