New Zealander vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,664,158 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 118.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,857, a difference of 33.6%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $92,239, a difference of 24.9%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $49,190, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,041, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $36,841, a difference of 15.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 38.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 83.6%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.6%).