Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,635,117 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $78,327, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $90,909, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $85,553, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,190, a difference of 5.6%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $37,857, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $42,884, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.8%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.1%), bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.1%).