Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,558,541 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 102.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $37,857, a difference of 35.7%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $49,190, a difference of 28.8%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $92,239, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $50,041, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $56,722, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $36,841, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 48.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.6%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.4%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 71.8%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.98%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 9.7%).