Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,341,757 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 35.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 29.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $50,041, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,513 compared to $92,239, a difference of 0.30%), householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $56,722, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $90,909, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 48.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 49.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.9%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 261.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 126.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 99.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 30.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 69.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 99.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (33.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.5%).