Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Laos
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,947,823 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.450% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 450.4 Immigrants from Laos.
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $90,909, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($43,844 compared to $42,884, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $56,722, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.81%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Fair 5.5% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.030%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 34.0% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.8%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.33%), 11th grade (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |