Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Laos
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,386,293 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 87.7 Immigrants from Laos.
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $85,553, a difference of 14.3%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $92,239, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $50,041, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,190, a difference of 0.73%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $42,884, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 64.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 152.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Fair 5.5% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 34.0% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.0%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 91.9%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |