Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,156,050 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 39.0 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $37,857, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $36,841, a difference of 6.0%), and median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $49,190, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $56,722, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.38%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and family households (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 79.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.7%).