Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,012,430 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 20.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $37,857, a difference of 37.5%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $49,190, a difference of 28.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $85,553, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $50,041, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $56,722, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 29.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 86.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 83.1%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%).