Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,447,888 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 41.5 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $36,841, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $90,909, a difference of 0.11%), median household income ($78,166 compared to $78,327, a difference of 0.21%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $85,553, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.2%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.53%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (44.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.77%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.6%), college, under 1 year (58.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).