Navajo vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,775,349 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($59,159 compared to $78,327, a difference of 32.4%), per capita income ($29,031 compared to $37,857, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $90,909, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $36,841, a difference of 11.5%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $42,884, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 108.4%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 94.9%), and single father poverty (29.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.5%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 96.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 93.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 51.4%), currently married (39.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.34, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.8%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and associate's degree (32.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.40%), 11th grade (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%).