Comanche vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,619,188 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.761% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 760.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,747 compared to $78,327, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $90,909, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,041, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,857, a difference of 0.61%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $49,190, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $56,722, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.9%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.16%), college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.1%).