Comanche vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,458,549 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 90.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,747 compared to $70,539, a difference of 4.5%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $36,631, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $46,368, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,015, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,003, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 11.2%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.52%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 65.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.5%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.0%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.3%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.3%).