Comanche vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,695,222 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.976. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.366% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 366.1 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $45,854, a difference of 20.4%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $104,488, a difference of 18.0%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $48,838, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $59,683, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,256, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.3%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.58%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.82%), currently married (45.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 9.5%).