Comanche vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Iroquois
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,838,235 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 14.5 Iroquois.
Comanche vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,104, a difference of 2.7%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $90,543, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.29%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $74,279, a difference of 0.72%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.69%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.0%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%), associate's degree (39.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Comanche vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |