Comanche vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,620,875 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 28.3 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,378, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $39,721, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,366, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $83,953, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $86,380, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.51%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.44%).