Comanche vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,023,018 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.340% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 339.7 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 18.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $99,650, a difference of 16.2%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $101,192, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $37,339, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,265, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $59,539, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.4%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 49.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.3%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.7%).