Comanche vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 1,702,437 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 81.0 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $94,448, a difference of 10.1%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $96,231, a difference of 8.7%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $37,024, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $49,348, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $57,426, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.74%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.2%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.0%).