Comanche vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,671,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $117,750, a difference of 37.3%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $100,151, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $57,078, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $43,648, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 59.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.9%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.4%).