Moroccan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,725,046 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,854 compared to $36,631, a difference of 25.2%), median household income ($86,468 compared to $70,539, a difference of 22.6%), and median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $46,368, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.2%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.75%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 54.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%).