Comanche vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 1,682,178 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.550. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.282% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 282.0 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $99,943, a difference of 16.5%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $85,818, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $94,423, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.35%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $59,656, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $39,328, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.87%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.2%).