Comanche vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,331,022 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.253% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 252.8 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.0%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $41,261, a difference of 15.7%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $42,406, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $54,163, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $90,266, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $93,919, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 24.8%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 154.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 73.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 21.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 57.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.6%).