Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,606,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.413% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 413.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $36,631, a difference of 33.1%), median household income ($91,015 compared to $70,539, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $83,943, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 48.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 45.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.73%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.4%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.3%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.32%), 11th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 48.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%).