Comanche vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,655,063 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 23.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $37,965, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $91,293, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $82,254, a difference of 0.12%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,916, a difference of 0.84%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $49,201, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.4%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.5%).