Comanche vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,908,026 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 37.8 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,747 compared to $91,541, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $106,109, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $100,283, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.94%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,558, a difference of 13.7%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $43,539, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.9%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (45.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.1%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.6%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.33%), ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.6%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.4%).