Comanche vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,708,345 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 138.1 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $34,559, a difference of 10.2%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,664, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $49,989, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($73,747 compared to $74,399, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $86,816, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $53,897, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.52%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.38%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.3%).