Brazilian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,231,582 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $36,631, a difference of 27.5%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $70,539, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $83,943, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $53,847, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 43.1%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 40.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.7%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.55%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%).