Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Chippewa

Poor
Fair
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,635,756 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 97.0 Chippewa.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 29.2%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $35,003, a difference of 17.0%), and median household income ($80,402 compared to $70,539, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $53,847, a difference of 2.8%), median family income ($94,466 compared to $86,852, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $83,943, a difference of 8.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 41.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
42.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 151.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 78.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 58.0%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 60.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChippewa
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%