Immigrants from Argentina vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,483,097 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 85.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $36,631, a difference of 35.5%), median household income ($92,417 compared to $70,539, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $83,943, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $53,847, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 52.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 44.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 78.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.6%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.6%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 69.8%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%).