South American vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,848,953 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,824 compared to $70,539, a difference of 23.1%), per capita income ($44,114 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $83,943, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $53,847, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $35,003, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 44.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 30.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households (66.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.8%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%).