Comanche vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,386,924 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $100,322, a difference of 16.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $102,151, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $37,856, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,597, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $45,710, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.2%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.1%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.3%).