Comanche vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,035,189 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.505% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 504.6 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $105,430, a difference of 22.9%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $46,531, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $108,161, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.80%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $62,522, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 24.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 10.6%).