Tsimshian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Chippewa

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,951,147 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Chippewa.
Tsimshian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $80,005, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $86,852, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,368, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $53,847, a difference of 8.1%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricTsimshianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Excellent
25.0%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 58.8%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.7%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
81.3%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.8%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianChippewa
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
42.6%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.6%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Tsimshian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and male disability (15.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianChippewa
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%