Tsimshian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Chippewa
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,951,147 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Chippewa.
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $80,005, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $86,852, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,368, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $53,847, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 25.0% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 58.8%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 81.3% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.8%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 42.6% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tsimshian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and male disability (15.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |