Comanche vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,243,019 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.742% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 741.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $103,536, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,183, a difference of 19.9%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $45,663, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $60,967, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.1%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 91.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 15.3%).